although I shall support the amendment to H.R. 1075, offered by Mr. Cox, which will add a noneconomic cap in medical malpractice awards, I do so with major reservations. The $250,000 cap is too low. My State of Maryland which originally enacted a $350,000 cap on noneconomic damages has increased that cap to $500,000. Such an amount is far more reasonable. I also resent the fact that the amendment is being considered without any opportunity for me to submit an amendment to the Cox amendment, No. 12, to raise the cap or for me to submit a separate amendment regarding this subject. My vote in favor of the Cox amendment should be interpreted only to support the inclusion of a cap. I trust the cap will be adequately adjusted by the Senate or in conference.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about a proposed cap on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice awards.
Share
More from Ben Cardin
I come to the floor today to introduce legislation that's essential for securing America's leadership in the defining geopolitical challenge of our time. Days from now, I will conclude my service as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations…
If Putin hates this so much, we're sure that there are a lot of other dictators who would hate this as well.
I know of no further debate on the bill, as amended. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there further debate? If not, the bill having been read the third time, the question is, Shall the bill pass? The bill (S. 920), as amended, was passed.
section 36(b) of the Arms Export Control Act requires that Congress receive prior notification of certain proposed arms sales as defined by that statute. Upon such notification, the Congress has 30 calendar days during which the sale may…





