On the recordMarch 15, 2017
I have a tremendous amount of respect for Lieutenant General McMaster and a great deal of admiration for his willingness to answer the call of service for his Nation as National Security Advisor. So I want to be clear that none of my comments are intended as a reflection on General McMaster himself. But I am greatly concerned about the current state of the organization that General McMaster is being asked to run and that the way in which the President and his senior advisers appear to be running it is creating great risk for our Nation. The President's first National Security Advisor, who lasted less than a month in office, had failed to register as a foreign agent, a job that he held throughout the Presidential campaign and into the transition--so much for America first. The initial Executive order structuring the National Security Council system for the new administration deliberately omitted the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the Director of National Intelligence from the Principals Committee--in other words, a National Security Council without the insight and guidance of our intelligence community or military. Every administration can structure the White House as it sees fit, but national security without intelligence or military advice is, frankly, mind-boggling. At the same time, the NSC was to include Steve Bannon, the President's political adviser.…





