The bipartisan alternative has a very narrowly drawn definition of the health situations under which a postviability abortion would be allowed. It says that the physician must certify that ``continuation of the pregnancy would threaten the mother's life or risk grievous injury to her physical health.'' Does this mean that there are no situations when a woman with a profound mental health problem would be permitted a postviability abortion under your bill?
Barbara Mikulski: “The bipartisan alternative has a very narrowly drawn definition of the health situations under which a postviability…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the definition of health situations for postviability abortions in a legislative debate.
Share
More from Barbara Mikulski
I rise today having submitted a resolution honoring the 40th anniversary of women attending the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, MD. Forty years ago, in 1975, Congress proudly authorized women to attend military service academies. That act…
it looks like this week is coming to an end in terms of legislative efforts--or the lack thereof--in the House and in the Senate. I want everyone to know what this week was. It seemed like the week of disruption. We had a filibuster in the…
I rise in support of the nomination of Dr. Carla Hayden to be the head of the Library of Congress. President Obama nominated her on February 24, 2016, and the Rules Committee held a hearing on April 20, 2016. I thank the chairman of the…





