I oppose Senator Enzi's amendments to the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Those amendments strike the words 'affected by' from sections 3 and 4 of the bill. These amendments, I believe, are not necessary, and I am concerned that they could lead courts to mistakenly read this legislation in too narrow a framework. The Senator from Wyoming argues that his amendments are necessary because the bill somehow expands the category of persons who may sue for discrimination under the civil rights laws referenced in the bill. His concern and his claim is that the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act would allow spouses and other relatives of the workers who suffer discrimination to file their own lawsuits, claiming that they have been affected by the discrimination of their relative.
Barbara Mikulski: “I oppose Senator Enzi's amendments to the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Those amendments strike the words 'affected by'…”
On the recordJanuary 22, 2009
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing amendments to the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Barbara Mikulski
Jun 22, 2016
First of all, thank you, to the Senator. I, in no way, want to impede this conversation. I didn't realize that you had asked for 45 minutes, and I really found these comments by the supporters of the bill really quite instructive, and I…
Jul 12, 2023
Without a monument to the great women of American history who paved the way for us to fully participate in and shape our democracy, the telling of the American story on our National Mall is not yet complete.
Aug 19, 2018
When constituents come to you, make sure you do not promise results but promise best efforts, that you'll give it your best.





