Mr. Speaker, I rise with concern about some of the wording in the preamble. I think this is the reason why we should actually go through the normal process, not a suspension process for something as critical as this resolution. Clearly, I have no argument against the threat that Russia has against democracies in Europe. My problem is with page 2, line 3: ``. . . internal threats from proponents of illiberalism.'' That is a progressive, leftwing dog whistle for Poland and Hungary. Why in the world, as Russia is attacking Ukraine, and Poland is the center for bringing our military assistance into Ukraine, why in the world in a preamble would we appear to attack one of our NATO allies? It is unnecessary. It is unwise. Again, having a Center for Democratic Resilience, I don't have an argument with that. My argument is with the preamble that clearly includes inflammatory language toward two of our best allies in NATO: Poland and Hungary.
Share & report
More from Andy Harris
Mr. Speaker, thank you very much. I thank the gentleman for yielding to me. Mr. Speaker, this afternoon I am going to talk a little about Bidenomics. It is interesting the President doesn't talking about Bidenomics anymore. He thought…
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to introduce the Emergency Border Control Resolution to kick-start the resolution process. As we stand here today, negotiations have stalled in the House. We all know this. We are at a crossroads in this…
One of the experts said, quite accurately, that when you deal with an addiction--and we won't get into that today, but by the way, just so everybody understands, it is now pretty clear from brain chemistry that sugar--and when we say…
Of course, they are sicker because we know these diseases relate to it. The studies were done against individuals who had the same socioeconomic status, same income, but were not getting SNAP benefits.





