I stand corrected. The gentleman is absolutely right. It is the unions actually forcing nonunion members to pay. And it is equally egregious. It equally is enforced under this, and that is why I oppose it. We should actually be increasing the funds. Again, I congratulate the gentleman for setting priorities. I just disagree with his priorities. Madam Chair, I urge the Members to oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Levin). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes appeared to have it.
Share & report
More from Andy Harris
To pay for this, we take money from the NIH buildings and facilities. That is true. However, Mr. Chairman, you know that the way CBO works is that we had to take it from that fund because we expect that money to be replaced from the…
The leadership at the Department of Homeland Security under the Biden administration is a complete and dangerous failure at our southern border. Last month, I joined nearly 60 of my House Republican colleagues to witness firsthand the…
First, it was that we are cutting it to FY 2000 levels, then it was 2001 levels. Now, they raised the ante. It is FY 2003 levels. The FY 2003 funding level in this bill was $17.55 billion. I will remind all the Americans watching that 17.5…
May I inquire how much time is remaining. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Maryland has 1\1/2\ minutes remaining.





