Mr. Speaker, it should be stated at the outset that not one Member of this body wants war. We all want peace. The decision whether to send American soldiers into battle is the most agonizing vote we will cast in Congress. It is a choice between confronting the horrors of war versus allowing a potentially devastating attack on our homeland, one that could kill tens of thousands of Americans. But make no mistake, the threat posed by Saddam Hussein also ultimately threatens world peace and stability. It is for this reason that we must consider the resolution before us today, allowing the President to take unilateral military action to disarm Iraq in the interest of long-term peace. First, I believe we must consider this issue in the context of the post-September 11 world. Our enemies and their supporters have demonstrated their willingness to strike at us in covert and highly-destructive ways. As a result of briefings I have received from military experts, former weapons inspectors and colleagues in the intelligence community, I am convinced that Iraq does indeed possess weapons of mass destruction. First, chemical and biological threats. Saddam Hussein has VX nerve gas, mustard gas, and anthrax. These toxins are deadly and could kill thousands.
Albert Russell Wynn: “Mr. Speaker, it should be stated at the outset that not one Member of this body wants war. We all want peace. The…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the potential military action against Iraq and the implications for national and world security.
Share
More from Albert Russell Wynn
I rise to sound the alarm, particularly for our baby boomers. This budget breaks into the Social Security trust fund, breaks into the lockbox, and raids the trust fund to the tune of $1.6 trillion. Members remember the lockbox. It was our…
Let me also note particularly the role of my Washington area colleague, the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Wolf) who just spoke, who has been an outstanding leader on the issue of human rights throughout his career but particularly on this…
This is a bad rule, specifically in the area of homeland security, because it forces us to provide homeland security on the cheap. What they do in this rule is block the Obey amendment. That means they block an additional $150 million for…
I am also delighted to join my colleagues in supporting the Do-Not-Call Implementation Act. Let me commend the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Stearns), our subcommittee chairman, as well as our newest and quite-generous-with-her-flattery new…





