I agree with Secretary Galvin. He has been very vigilant on behalf of consumers, especially financial consumers.
Steve Lynch
The Public Record
Stephen Francis Lynch is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for Massachusetts's 8th congressional district since 2001. A member of the Democratic Party, Lynch has focused on issues such as healthcare, labor rights, and economic development throughout his tenure. He has been an advocate for working families and has worked to secure funding for various projects in his district.
we need to re-engineer that program, so that we comply with the constitutional rights that Americans have, right?
this is not the case where in the usual context air marshals will be placed on planes when we know that someone who is on the no-fly list or someone who is a suspect is going to travel.
So I am just asking you to try to change that as well when you change the culture there at TSA.
Thank you very much. Mr. Chairman. I appreciate the courtesy. I want to thank you for holding this hearing.
If we had enough concern about Hillary's emails to do nine investigations in the House, and two in the Senate, and have hundreds of hearings on that issue, because we thought--a U.S. official mishandled their emails, hundreds of hearings…
I just worry that if we allow our electoral process, if we allow doubt to creep into the minds of the American people that the elections are not legitimate, then our leaders are not legitimate, then our laws are not legitimate.
This used to be the Oversight Committee, this is the running away from oversight committee.
Let me first thank the gentleman from California for his kind words on behalf of my legislation and on behalf of John Adams in particular. Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the gentlewoman from Guam, Ms. Bordallo, for yielding this time. Mr…
I want to thank the gentleman from California for his words of support and also thank the gentleman from Arizona for the courtesy of yielding me this time. Mr. Speaker, I rise to express strong support for my bill, H.R. 1037, the National…
Do we want to change that narrative? Do we want to change the one of supporting Israel's right to defend itself to one where the talk is Israel's annexing the Golan in violation of the previous agreement that has been in place since 1974…
No one is calling for Israeli withdrawal from the Golan. Why not support the happy status quo?





