the Small Business Programs Improvement Act of 1996 reforms business loan programs administered by the Small Business Administration [SBA]. Specifically, the bill reduces subsidy rates for commercial development and disaster loans, directs the SBA to privatize certain aspects of the loan application and approval process to expedite service to potential borrowers, and ensures adequate Federal funding to carry out SBA programs. H.R. 3719 includes an amendment I offered, which was adopted during the full committee markup of this legislation, regarding disaster assistance loans. My amendment accomplished two things: No. 1, it made an addition to the definition of a disaster under section (3)(k) of the Small Business Act by inserting language regarding ocean conditions; and No. 2, it set an effective date, for the amendment, with respect to any disaster occurring on or after March 1, 1994. I offered this amendment in an attempt to help remedy problems affecting the fishing industry in Gloucester and other areas in Massachusetts. The Commonwealth requested disaster assistance from the U.S. Small Business Administration. The request was made on behalf of the fishermen of Essex, Bristol, and Barnstable Counties, all who have suffered severe economic losses because of the collapse of cod, yellow tail flounder, and haddock fisheries in their region, and the closing of certain areas to fishing by the Federal Government. Incredibly, this request was denied by the SBA.
Peter Torkildsen: “the Small Business Programs Improvement Act of 1996 reforms business loan programs administered by the Small Business…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Small Business Programs Improvement Act of 1996 and its impact on disaster assistance loans.
Share
More from Peter Torkildsen
I am talking about the welfare system in the United States today. We have allowed a program designed to assist those in need to become a monster that too often turns into a long-term addiction. Instead of helping families stay together…
I rise today with regret that this House is once again using important debate time reserved for national security concerns to address the socially divisive issue of abortion. We have been through this same debate several times in committee…
I would like to applaud my colleague from Massachusetts as ranking member of the subcommittee, also in his previous role as chairman of the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, a very, very strong advocate of this program and many…
I think that is what this amendment does. I think some of the critics of NEA have legitimate points, but those criticisms have been addressed. Obscenity is no longer fundable, as it should not be. Certainly, that is progress that has been…





