I think that is what this amendment does. I think some of the critics of NEA have legitimate points, but those criticisms have been addressed. Obscenity is no longer fundable, as it should not be. Certainly, that is progress that has been made in this area. But while grants are talked about for NEA funding, most people do not realize far more funding goes to education programs. Consider the NEA places thousands of teachers in schools to teach young people art. I understand the gentleman's concern for budget restraints. I urge Members to vote against this amendment and support responsible funding for the arts.
Peter Torkildsen: “I think that is what this amendment does. I think some of the critics of NEA have legitimate points, but those…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing an amendment related to funding for the National Endowment for the Arts.
Share
More from Peter Torkildsen
I want to applaud the effort of the gentlewoman from Kansas, the chairman of the full committee, for the great work she has done in getting this bill to the floor today. Mr. Speaker, we are looking at reauthorizing the 7(a) program, and…
Making sure that prisoners do not collect benefits while in jail is certainly one of them. Convicted criminals in jail should not collect taxpayer-funded payments while there. Period. But under a loophole in existing law, felons who are…
I want to applaud the gentlewoman's leadership in moving this bill through the full committee and to the House floor. Mr. Chairman, the legislation before us, the Paperwork Elimination Act of 1996, will require the Federal Government to…
Twenty-seven years ago as a Republican US senator from Massachusetts, I introduced the ``Brooke Amendment'' to keep rents affordable for low-income families, elders, veterans and disabled people living in public housing. Then, as now…





