I think that is what this amendment does. I think some of the critics of NEA have legitimate points, but those criticisms have been addressed. Obscenity is no longer fundable, as it should not be. Certainly, that is progress that has been made in this area. But while grants are talked about for NEA funding, most people do not realize far more funding goes to education programs. Consider the NEA places thousands of teachers in schools to teach young people art. I understand the gentleman's concern for budget restraints. I urge Members to vote against this amendment and support responsible funding for the arts.
Peter Torkildsen: “I think that is what this amendment does. I think some of the critics of NEA have legitimate points, but those…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing an amendment related to funding for the National Endowment for the Arts.
Share
More from Peter Torkildsen
Twenty-seven years ago as a Republican US senator from Massachusetts, I introduced the ``Brooke Amendment'' to keep rents affordable for low-income families, elders, veterans and disabled people living in public housing. Then, as now…
State maritime academies like Massachusetts Maritime operate their ready Reserve ships at one-third of that expended by the Federal Government to maintain similar vessels in a like readiness status. These academies provide a high return on…
I am talking about the welfare system in the United States today. We have allowed a program designed to assist those in need to become a monster that too often turns into a long-term addiction. Instead of helping families stay together…
I think it is a key point where you have a large group of Members, of new blood, that you can tackle some problems that really have not been addressed in the past. But the same body passed laws to address all of those wrongs, but look…





