The removal of the deposits, and the contract with the state banks to receive those deposits, he asserts were both unlawful; and the measure itself neither lawful nor just--an arbitrary act, without law and against law.
Josiah Quincy: “The removal of the deposits, and the contract with the state banks to receive those deposits, he asserts were both…”
Editor's note · Context
Quincy critiques President Jackson's actions regarding the removal of public funds, emphasizing their illegality and injustice.
Share
More from Josiah Quincy
He knew how little a majority of the men of his own time were disposed or qualified to estimate his character with justice.
In what language of composure or of decency can I say to you that there is in this bitter and venomous charge not one single word of truth; that it is from beginning to end grossly, glaringly, wilfully false?--false even in the name of the…
The charge, therefore, that our government did really give up that important territory, when it was at its option to retain it, is purely and unqualifiedly untrue; and I now charge that it was known by Mr.
Though conscious, being then in his seventy-eighth year, that he stood on the threshold of human life, he sought no relaxation from duty, no exemption from its performance.





