Mr. Chairman, we were apprised last night that the language as the gentleman has read it, in fact, left a question of interpretation as to what the words ``activities related to the Kyoto Protocol'' would mean. And the Clerks advised me and others who were interested in this that there would be no ambiguity if the word related was tied to the very provisions that are in the previous proviso, which is, of course, the provided further proviso that gives the bill language as it has stood, and that, therefore, it would be limited very carefully to those items.
John W. Olver: “Mr. Chairman, we were apprised last night that the language as the gentleman has read it, in fact, left a question of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing language interpretation related to the Kyoto Protocol during a committee meeting.
Share
More from John W. Olver
I will then move to strike the last word. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Massachusetts is recognized for 5 minutes.
At this point, I really don't know whether your understanding is anywhere close to mine. I think this is an amendment deserving of opposition, so I am opposing the amendment. I think this amendment should not be adopted, and you can do as…
And this was an executive order promulgated by President Clinton or by President Bush?
You have hit the gavel. I would like to ask unanimous consent to call for a recorded vote on that. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Massachusetts was on his feet. The request is timely and does not require unanimous consent. Pursuant…





