Mr. Chairman, we were apprised last night that the language as the gentleman has read it, in fact, left a question of interpretation as to what the words ``activities related to the Kyoto Protocol'' would mean. And the Clerks advised me and others who were interested in this that there would be no ambiguity if the word related was tied to the very provisions that are in the previous proviso, which is, of course, the provided further proviso that gives the bill language as it has stood, and that, therefore, it would be limited very carefully to those items.
John W. Olver: “Mr. Chairman, we were apprised last night that the language as the gentleman has read it, in fact, left a question of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing language interpretation related to the Kyoto Protocol during a committee meeting.
Share
More from John W. Olver
The European Union has implemented an emissions trading regimen as a means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 20 percent below 1990 levels. They are not succeeding very much. They are putting in a fairly hard effort to do that, but the…
This is an amendment that would take a huge chunk out of the CDBG program. This is one of the areas in which I have been particularly, I thought, most commendable about what the chairman's mark is in the bill for the CDBG. The CDBG is a…
I'm not sure I have anything much to add to what my chairman has said, other than to just point out, if you look back at the number of dollars that were assigned for the fiscal year '11 bill, that was over $4.6 billion. So in 2012, the…
The issue here seems to be--and I don't know this very well. The issue seems to be that there have been cases where discrimination has occurred, and it has been adjudicated as having occurred when there was no intent to do so in the first…





