As far as I can see, the amendment is essentially the same. It is based on exactly the same citation in the U.S. Code but has a different target. But again, the amendment is merely a restatement of current law which already prohibits the employment of unauthorized aliens. So again, the rest of my previous statement applies, and I am willing to accept the amendment if the ranking member is also willing to do so.
Discussing an amendment related to the employment of unauthorized aliens.
Share
More from John W. Olver
And this was an executive order promulgated by President Clinton or by President Bush?
I will be very brief. I serve on the Homeland Security Subcommittee for Appropriations, and I don't think that the Homeland Security authorizers have done anything along these lines, and that's where it really ought to be dealt with, I…
I will be brief. I wish the gentleman from Minnesota great luck in solving this one. I am so happy for the people on that side of the aisle who must be just ecstatic--ecstatic--that they have a President who will take all of these things…
Now at this point we have--I think this is the last of this group of amendments that have been proposed in this area, in essence. And when you put them together, because one was for $6.5 million, one was for about $5 million, then there…
Other voices in this conversation
