If I may, that is a right which we as Americans cherish, the right of self-defense, defending yourself against attack, as individuals, as families. That is written into the United Nations charter, the right of nations to their own self defense. This is what I have said again and again is the most--the starting act which allowed this genocide to go forward, in fact, the arms embargo, in such a way that the insurgent Serb nationalists, that minority of the population, always had the possibility of supply and resupply from Yugoslavia; whereas the Croatians first and much more critically over the longer period of time the Bosnians, simply did not have the opportunity to get arms. That is the most immoral kind of act on an international level that you could apply to people and then to also propose that you have safe havens. And the United Nations resolutions for safe havens, and then we, acting with the United Nations and the U.N. as a whole, does not have the guts to enforce its own safe haven resolutions, which then leave a city like Gorzade being destroyed, destroyed before the very eyes of the world. And a city like Srebrenica being simply strangled and starved. And so it goes. That represents really the most abject moral abdication of moral responsibility, it seems to me.
John W. Olver: “If I may, that is a right which we as Americans cherish, the right of self-defense, defending yourself against attack…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the moral implications of the arms embargo during the Bosnian War.
Share
More from John W. Olver
I will be very brief. I serve on the Homeland Security Subcommittee for Appropriations, and I don't think that the Homeland Security authorizers have done anything along these lines, and that's where it really ought to be dealt with, I…
I'm not sure I have anything much to add to what my chairman has said, other than to just point out, if you look back at the number of dollars that were assigned for the fiscal year '11 bill, that was over $4.6 billion. So in 2012, the…
Woman, I rise in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Massachusetts is recognized for 5 minutes.
I think that what the chairman has said is probably about as good as it gets. What we have now is a slightly amended version of the proposal. My understanding is that the major long-distance trucking companies are against this language and…





