Mr. Speaker, the idea that you can increase revenues was very thoroughly debunked in the 1980's, when tax reductions were given and when the deficits went right through the ceiling during that period. And during a 12-year period we saw more than a quadrupling of our national debt, with deficits year after year that ran between $200 and $350 billion per year, that economically have brought us to the sorry state that we are presently in. But in any case, no economists agree that we should be doing this kind of tax break.
John W. Olver: “Mr. Speaker, the idea that you can increase revenues was very thoroughly debunked in the 1980's, when tax reductions…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of tax reductions and national debt during a floor speech.
Share
More from John W. Olver
Excuse me. Thank you very much. Please forgive me. You don't even look alike. I think I was mistaking you for a different member of the California delegation. I thank the gentleman from Iowa for correcting me. In any case, I rise in…
In any case, I don't object to the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Cassidy). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment Offered…
The amendment that has been offered removes a 3 percent increase in the administrative account for the Office of Public and Indian Housing. I rise to oppose the amendment. In this instance, the cuts in the Office of Public and Indian…
And this was an executive order promulgated by President Clinton or by President Bush?





