Webster’s comment is, that this case, “if it have any analogy to the matter,” means, that if a man’s horse “stray into his neighbor’s field, he cannot lead him back without a previous trial by jury to ascertain the right.” Was ever the plain meaning of a sentence more exactly changed about, end for end?
Mann critiques Webster's misinterpretation of a legal analogy, highlighting the importance of precise language.
Share
More from Horace Mann
Cast it off, West Virginians, whilst yet you have the power; for if you let it descend unbroken to your children, it will have grown to a mountain of misery upon their heads.
But the impious hand of man divorces these twin capacities, wherever it denies knowledge.
Slavery is an unspeakable wrong to the conscience.
What rights are more sacred or more dear to us than the conjugal and the parental?
Other voices in this conversation
