On the record
But if he took them for the purpose of carrying them to a free state, and of thus restoring them to their natural liberty, then he did not intend to convert them to his own use, and is not guilty of stealing.
Source
gutenberg.orgBut if he took them for the purpose of carrying them to a free state, and of thus restoring them to their natural liberty, then he did not intend to convert them to his own use, and is not guilty of stealing.
Mann discusses the legal implications of taking slaves to free states, framing it as an act of restoring liberty rather than theft.
Share
More from Horace Mann
So far as legal rights against his oppressors are concerned, the slave lives in such a world of darkness.
The institution of slavery is against natural right.
It is only in the land of slaves that they are blotted out and annihilated.
Yet, by denying education to the slave, you destroy not merely the right, but the power, of personal examination in regard to all that most nearly concerns the soul’s interests.