To this principle of interpretation, all strict or narrow criticism, founded on its literal meaning, must yield.
George F. Hoar: “To this principle of interpretation, all strict or narrow criticism, founded on its literal meaning, must yield.”
Editor's note · Context
Hoar argues against a strict interpretation of the Constitution, advocating for a broader understanding.
Share
More from George F. Hoar
To go fully into the role of the number three in British traditions would require a profound study; but it may be useful briefly to note its influence on the Bardic poetry-- the Triads, where the subjects are all grouped in threes.
And the Greeks, in turn, owed their astronomy to the Egyptians, with whom the year was reckoned as of three hundred and sixty days; and this three hundred and sixty-day year gives us the clue to the forty-day period for holding the Forest…
The language Statius uses is more simple than mine; but this is substantially the picture he gives: and I know of nothing that so impresses on the imagination the thunder of the power of the Roman Empire as this creation in the wilderness…
This Treaty would make us a vulgar, common place empire, controlling subject races and vassal states, in which one class must forever rule and other classes forever obey.





