One is that if the jury is to judge of the law, you will have as many different laws as you have juries.
Editor's note · Context
Hoar presents a key argument against jury nullification, emphasizing the potential for inconsistent laws.
Share
More from George F. Hoar
Edward Everett preached a sermon when he was twenty-four years old before a large audience in the Representatives Chamber at Washington which was heard with breathless silence.
But I confess I like to leave on record, if I may, some evidence which will contradict the charge so constantly made by critics near home, that I am a man of intense partisan and personal bitterness.
When the treaty was signed, the struggle began between freedom and slavery for the control of this imperial domain.
It was undoubtedly the chief object of this last provision to prevent the perpetuation of power in the same hands, or under the same influences, by removing the choice of President wholly from the control of persons wielding National…





