But in the case of these particular laws persons of less dignity and authority, often quite obscure when they are appointed, whose whole duty is odious to the persons to be affected by it, instead of giving dignity to the law tend to make it unpopular by their attempts to enforce it.
Editor's note · Context
Hoar critiques the appointment of less dignified officials to enforce unpopular laws, arguing it undermines the law's authority.
Share
More from George F. Hoar
It would have been a worse civil war than that of the Rebellion, because the country would have been divided not by sections, but by parties.
It was undoubtedly the chief object of this last provision to prevent the perpetuation of power in the same hands, or under the same influences, by removing the choice of President wholly from the control of persons wielding National…
This Treaty would make us a vulgar, common place empire, controlling subject races and vassal states, in which one class must forever rule and other classes forever obey.
A complete system of education at the National charge was an essential element of the reconstruction policy.





