Please don't tell me about advocating change for the future. What I'd like to know is what are you doing to manage the risks that are in front of Citi and facing the American people, right now?

It's essential that no institution is viewed----

But of the original nine that needed money within weeks of the original TARP infusion--you got $25 billion, someone said you--the Secretary of the Treasury said you were financially healthy, and within weeks you needed another $20 billion…

We don't want to be a shareholder in that company and we think that companies are far stronger if they're public--if they're financed out of the public, rather than the government.

But it's your view that Citi isn't getting that from its higher rating, it's not getting that benefit of being A rated?

But Standard & Poor's, the rating agency, is giving you a bump. The bump is valuable.

Without GMAC, GM was unlikely to survive?

You wiped out all of its equity, you caused its debt to have to take a haircut, and that's what helped put it back on firm footing.

The difference is, that you're trying to capitalize what is now a much stronger company.

Thank you. I'm past my time.

I'm not commenting on what the prior Administration did, I'm just observing what they did.