Maintaining our existing arsenal and our current program of record has to be our priority here.

So, the Administration's Nuclear Posture Review calls for a new low-yield submarine-launched ballistic missile.

So you cannot give me an answer right now on how long it will take to do this?

I think maintaining our current arsenal and our current programs should be our number-one priority.

Thank you, Mr. President. I have come to the floor of the Senate five times over the past week to talk about how the bank lobbyist act puts American families in danger of getting punched in the gut in another financial crisis. I have…

According to an article that was published last month, you discussed plans to change how you report Missile Defense Agency testing plans to the public.

I think it's important that it be done by the end of the life extension program.

I just have real concerns about your agency's capacity to take on additional work.

I find the number of unknowns that we heard before from the administrator and that still seem to be there worrisome.

Will the impact on readiness be part of the Department's analysis of alternatives?

Will putting nuclear weapons on attack submarines or surface ships require making new arrangements for port visits?

According to your previous public comments, the B83 is required to hold certain targets in North Korea at risk.