Mr. Chairman, nothing could be further from the truth. The way the IAEA works is accounting principles. They get to stand at one door and check as it goes in and then the back door to check if it comes out. If it does not come out, which it has not in North Korea, then there is a problem inside. In Japan, 150 went in, nine bombs' worth; 150 has not come out, nine bombs' worth. It is inside, or it has been diverted. The IAEA does not know and cannot certify. America loses its credibility with every other country in the world, friend and foe, if we engage in contracts with allies like Japan and then do not certify where nuclear bomb material could go that could threaten China or the Korean political situation in a way that could come back to haunt us 3 and 4 and 5 years down the line.
Ed Markey: “Mr. Chairman, nothing could be further from the truth. The way the IAEA works is accounting principles. They get to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of IAEA inspections and nuclear material accountability.
Share
More from Ed Markey
FERC has a statutory obligation to ensure that consolidation in the energy sector serves the public interest, not corporate profits. It is impossible to see how this consolidation will not put the public interest at risk.
As energy costs rise and market power becomes increasingly concentrated, FERC must use its authority to protect consumers from transactions that threaten competition, affordability, and reliability. It should do so here and deny the…
Congress must pass my Youth AI Privacy Act to protect kids using AI chatbots and pass COPPA 2.0 to update my original law.
The agency should also address the thousands of potential toxins already used that the GRAS loophole has rubberstamped since its creation.





