I am only using the Bush administration numbers that there would be $35 billion that would need to be spent in order to finish this project, and additional tens of billions of dollars if an alternative Brilliant Pebbles project was adopted as well. We are only using the Republican administration numbers in this debate. The only question we have now is whether or not, given our success in basically destroying the Soviet Union, there is an identifiable enemy in the world that can justify this kind of expenditure. I would argue not, given the other tremendous pressures on our military and on our civilian budget that is going to become more evident as this unfolds.
Ed Markey: “I am only using the Bush administration numbers that there would be $35 billion that would need to be spent in order to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing military spending and the justification for defense projects during a budget debate.
Share
More from Ed Markey
TPS holders are our friends, our neighbors, and our colleagues. In cities and towns across Massachusetts and Delaware, Haitian TPS holders have lived, worked, and been valuable members of our communities for years. They deserve the…
This dangerous deal is the starting gun for a Middle East nuclear arms race.
I urge the Trump administration to use Robert’s case as motivation to continue to advocate for the release of others wrongfully detained in Russia and around the world.
I am also seeking information related to ICE’s harmful, nontransparent operation of the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (“ISAP”)—an alternative to detention program—in the Commonwealth.





