To suppose them surrendered in any other way than by equal rules and general consent was to suppose men idiot or mad, whose acts are not binding.
Editor's note · Context
Sumner critiques the notion of consent in governance, arguing for the necessity of equal representation.
Share
More from Charles Sumner
Nay, more,--if it would be criminal in these several clusters of States to reëstablish the Institution of War as Arbiter of Justice, then is it criminal in the Commonwealth of Nations to continue it.
Far above any flickering light or battle-lantern of party is the everlasting sun of Truth, in whose beams are the duties of men.
Without yielding to any of these extreme views with regard to the mischiefs or the benefits of party, all should agree that the only true and legitimate object of such an association is to uphold, advance, and develop certain principles…
It applies an arrogant and unrelenting ostracism to all who express themselves against Slavery.





