Surely, on every principle of reason or evidence, the insignificance of this loss, in transactions on so large a scale, and extending over three years of time, constitutes an unanswerable presumption in favor of the respondents, excluding, as it does, any adequate motive for the perpetration of fraud.
Sumner argues that the small loss suggests no motive for fraud in the larger transactions.
Share
More from Charles Sumner
Women’s National League, petition of, for universal emancipation, X. 300.
Early testimony of the Church against, I. 59.
Contrary to Christianity, but upheld by the Church, I. 54, 58.
His loyalty to the Declaration of Independence, XIX. 317.
Other voices in this conversation
