On the record
I insist, that, whatever the original intention of the framers of that clause, they did not leave it so as to cover fugitive slaves.
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Sumner asserts that regardless of the framers' intentions, the constitutional clause does not cover fugitive slaves.
Share
More from Charles Sumner
Nay, more,--if it would be criminal in these several clusters of States to reëstablish the Institution of War as Arbiter of Justice, then is it criminal in the Commonwealth of Nations to continue it.
As the Brotherhood of Man is practically recognized, it becomes impossible to restrict the feeling within any exclusive circle of country, and to set up an unchristian distinction of honor between civil war and international war.
In this contest, we may borrow from the ancient Greek, who, when his hands were cut off, fought with his stumps, and even with his teeth.
Tendencies of nations, as revealed in history, teach that our aims are in harmony with prevailing laws, which God, in his benevolence, has ordained for mankind.
Other voices in this conversation
