Thus undertaking, merely with the consent of the Senate, and without the concurrence of the House of Representatives, to abrogate a treaty, the President has assumed a power inconsistent with the Constitution, and disowned by the practice of the Government, adopted, after debate, on leading occasions.
Sumner argues that the President's unilateral action to abrogate a treaty violates the Constitution.
Share
More from Charles Sumner
Working-men of Europe, desire abolition of war, XVIII. 236.
The only Constitutional party and party of freedom, VII. 38.
Opening of United States courts to colored, XI. 389.
Consent of the governed necessary in forming new governments of, XII. 298.
Other voices in this conversation
