On the record
It is easy to show that the language of the National Constitution, if seen in the light of English parliamentary history, must have an interpretation identical with its natural import.
Source
gutenberg.orgIt is easy to show that the language of the National Constitution, if seen in the light of English parliamentary history, must have an interpretation identical with its natural import.
Sumner argues that the interpretation of the National Constitution should align with its historical context in English parliamentary history.
Share
More from Charles Sumner
Sovereignty of, belongs to the people, XVI. 28.
Opening of United States courts to colored, XI. 389.
The only Constitutional party and party of freedom, VII. 38.
Working-men of Europe, desire abolition of war, XVIII. 236.