For what one civil right is worth a rush, after a man’s property is subject to be taken from him at pleasure, without his consent?
Editor's note · Context
Sumner questions the value of civil rights if property can be taken without consent.
Share
More from Charles Sumner
The first is a heavenly sentiment, from God: the other is a device of this world.
By Perpetual Peace Kant understood a condition of nations where there could be no fear of War; and this condition, he said, was demanded by reason, which, abhorring all War, as little adapted to establish right, must regard this final…
Controlled by such a code, employing such representatives, sustained by such agencies, animated by such Furies, and producing such fruits of tears and bitterness, it must be open to question.
More precious far at that moment the consolation that he had labored for his fellow-men, and the joyous confidence that all his cares had helped the Progress of his race!





