On the record
If this monopoly is offensive on its face, it becomes still more offensive, when we consider the motive in which it had its origin.
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Sumner critiques a monopoly that he finds particularly offensive due to its underlying motives.
Share
More from Charles Sumner
Controlled by such a code, employing such representatives, sustained by such agencies, animated by such Furies, and producing such fruits of tears and bitterness, it must be open to question.
In this contest, we may borrow from the ancient Greek, who, when his hands were cut off, fought with his stumps, and even with his teeth.
Without yielding to any of these extreme views with regard to the mischiefs or the benefits of party, all should agree that the only true and legitimate object of such an association is to uphold, advance, and develop certain principles…
Still further: every ship-of-war that floats costs more than a well-endowed college.
Other voices in this conversation
