Mr. Speaker, again let me read the language of the bill that the gentleman just referred to, that terrible piece of language. It says in effect that in administering the prescription drug benefit program established under this, the Secretary may not, number two, interfere in any way with negotiations between private entities and drug manufacturers or wholesalers; or, three, otherwise interfere with the competitive nature of providing prescriptive drug benefit through private entities. That language in the bill comes from a motion to recommit prepared and filed in this House in the 106th Congress by the gentleman from California (Mr. Stark) on his motion to recommit. It is language of the other side that they are complaining about.
William Tauzin: “Mr. Speaker, again let me read the language of the bill that the gentleman just referred to, that terrible piece of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing provisions of a prescription drug benefit program during House debate.
Share
More from William Tauzin
The conferees intend that section 231 of the conference agreement shall go into effect immediately upon enactment and be available to license applicants in all ongoing and future hydroelectric licensing proceedings under the Federal Power…
my State, Louisiana, is suffering the worst national ecological disaster in the history of this country. Every year we lose up to 35 square miles of the most precious wetlands in America. The comprehensive energy bill we passed yesterday…
New subsection (k) permits the President to waive, in writing, only the consent portion of the conditions of authorization set forth in section 564(e) with respect to armed services personnel, and only to the extent that complying with the…
I share your grief at the passing of former President Ronald Reagan and join you in remembering his remarkable service to our country. I was fortunate to have served as a Member of Congress during President Reagan's eight year tenure. At…





