I got a letter from the Congressional Budget Office indicating that they prepared a preliminary estimate of the impact of the Democratic amendment to H.R. 1, the Democratic plan; and the estimate of CBO of their plan is $1 trillion. So a speech complaining about the fact that we in this House passed a budget that included $400 billion for this important program for seniors is wrong, when the other side prepared an amendment for $1 trillion; that is a little outrageous.
William Tauzin: “I got a letter from the Congressional Budget Office indicating that they prepared a preliminary estimate of the impact…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the budget impact of a Democratic amendment during a House debate.
Share
More from William Tauzin
This Nation is suffering. We are in dire need of a policy that tells the energy future traders on Wall Street to quit running the prices up and to begin thinking about a future where we are producing more energy at home for our own people…
In fact, we have been asked so many times, is this a free-speech issue. The United States Constitution gives you the right to speak; it does not give you the right to be heard. None of us have an obligation to listen if we do not want to…
Our purpose in requiring GSA to spread this incremental cost across the entire Federal fleet is, in fact, to remove the cost disincentive for some Federal agencies, to improve EPACT compliance, and to minimize the overall cost to the…
ETBE is included within the definition of a renewable fuel. The conference report attempts to provide maximum flexibility to the refining marketplace to achieve the goals of both the new renewable fuels requirement and, therefore, ETBE is…





