Reclaiming my time, this is not an additional amendment. This is a substitute for your own amendment. The idea is before I and other Members who support this bill are willing to accept your amendment which deletes language from the Sundstrand decision, we think you ought to have language that clarifies what the Supreme Court said. That is what this amendment does.
Discussing an amendment related to the Sundstrand decision during a House floor debate.
Share
More from William Tauzin
I want to illustrate one of the real inadequacies of the Democratic substitute. In the main bill we reformed something called average wholesale price. I hope everyone knows what that is. I am going to illustrate it for you tonight. Under…
Let me reiterate again, the motion to instruct, to all Members of the House who are paying attention to this debate, basically says to the Senate and House conferees: accept the Senate language, take the Senate bill, take the Democratic…
I got a letter from the Congressional Budget Office indicating that they prepared a preliminary estimate of the impact of the Democratic amendment to H.R. 1, the Democratic plan; and the estimate of CBO of their plan is $1 trillion. So a…
I think it is as important to our country as perhaps the Manhattan Project was. I remember when Speaker O'Neill used to remind this House that partisanship ended at the water's edge. He meant to tell us that when it came to protecting our…
Other voices in this conversation
