The answer is that the judge has discretion to fix that undertaking. He can fix it at $1, $1,000, $2,000 $10,000 whatever it requires to guarantee that in effect the losing party is going to be able to respond to his order to shift the fees if it should occur and the judge still maintains a great deal of discretion.
Discussing judicial discretion in fixing financial undertakings in court cases.
Share
More from William Tauzin
Mr. Speaker, let me again emphasize this is extraordinary. The court decision came out yesterday. The leadership of this House authorized this bill to the floor today. We are about to pass this bill, I believe the Senate is about to do the…
In fact, we have been asked so many times, is this a free-speech issue. The United States Constitution gives you the right to speak; it does not give you the right to be heard. None of us have an obligation to listen if we do not want to…
Our purpose in requiring GSA to spread this incremental cost across the entire Federal fleet is, in fact, to remove the cost disincentive for some Federal agencies, to improve EPACT compliance, and to minimize the overall cost to the…
Mr. Speaker, again let me read the language of the bill that the gentleman just referred to, that terrible piece of language. It says in effect that in administering the prescription drug benefit program established under this, the…
Other voices in this conversation
