Mr. Chairman, the amount that the Government is going to have to pay any landowner for taking his property is going to depend mightily on the actions of the agency from this date forward. If the agency wants to declare 60 percent of the State of Louisiana wetlands, I suspect it is going to be a very expensive proposition. If the agency wants to protect real wetlands and wants to protect habitat in circumstances where it does not have to take 21 counties of Texas for a single bird, it is going to have a much lower cost to that agency. It depends on the agencies and their regulatory practices.
William Tauzin: “Mr. Chairman, the amount that the Government is going to have to pay any landowner for taking his property is going to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of government property acquisition and regulatory practices.
Share
More from William Tauzin
yes, it does. And it is a little complex, so let me try to explain. Briefly the requester would, in fact, pay the same transmission cost as any other transmission customer. The embedded cost language simply clarifies that in the up-front…
I am proud to rise in favor of S. 313, the Animal Drug User Fee Act (``ADUFA''), sponsored in the House by my good friend from Michigan, Mr. Upton. This legislation, modeled after the successful Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), is…
I think it is as important to our country as perhaps the Manhattan Project was. I remember when Speaker O'Neill used to remind this House that partisanship ended at the water's edge. He meant to tell us that when it came to protecting our…
Mr. Speaker, again let me read the language of the bill that the gentleman just referred to, that terrible piece of language. It says in effect that in administering the prescription drug benefit program established under this, the…





