As the gentleman knows, we plan later on to offer an amendment that I think cures this problem, and that is if the legislature, this Congress, stays within the glideslope projections that take us to a balance budget, we are not going to have this problem at all. It is only when we spend in excess that then the President would have to exercise the line-item veto to keep us on line, in which case every program ought to be examined to see if there is pork in it, every single one. I think the gentleman is correct in that view. I would urge that that view prevail on this floor.
William Tauzin: “As the gentleman knows, we plan later on to offer an amendment that I think cures this problem, and that is if the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budgetary amendments and the line-item veto during a congressional debate.
Share
More from William Tauzin
When we came out of the movie, I said, Son, what did you take from this? What did this mean to you? And he thought a long while and in the car with me he said, what I take from this movie, Dad, is that freedom is meaningless without…
In summation, let me again thank the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Markey) and the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Dingell) for their extraordinary bipartisan cooperation in moving this as rapidly as we have. It is the sort of cooperation…
I particularly also want to congratulate and thank my friend, the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Markey), the ranking member of the subcommittee, and my dear friend, the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Dingell), the dean of our House and…
today I cast my last vote in this august Chamber, and today I spend my last day with my colleagues here with nearly 25 years of service on behalf of the third congressional district and the great people who live there in Louisiana, and I…





