Because it is one of the acts that has the potential of regulation to limit the value or the actual right to own water in the West, and because it has that potential, it is included as a regulatory action that could diminish the value indeed of an important property right.
William Tauzin: “Because it is one of the acts that has the potential of regulation to limit the value or the actual right to own water…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of regulatory actions on water ownership rights in the West.
Share
More from William Tauzin
let me first indicate that, of course, I am rising in strong support of H.R. 2898, the E-911 Implementation Act of 2003. House bill 2898 has already passed the House Committee on Energy and Commerce; and it did so unanimously, as one might…
New subsection (k) permits the President to waive, in writing, only the consent portion of the conditions of authorization set forth in section 564(e) with respect to armed services personnel, and only to the extent that complying with the…
Mr. Speaker, there may be no other bill the House considers this year or next that will benefit America more than H.R. 6, the Energy Policy Act of 2003. Let me tell my colleagues what this conference report is about. It is about America's…
let me first pay special thanks and appreciation to the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Baker) who has worked tirelessly this week to try to find some rational amendment to this bill that made it somewhat better for those of us who represent…





