I would just point out the language in the bill is much improved over the language last year that the gentleman from Texas and I offered. If the language we had in the bill was so good last year, I want to know why we did not get a markup on the bill. This language is much better, much more specific. It is the kind of language that would prevent fishing expeditions. We ought to reject this amendment and pass this good bill.
Discussing improvements in a bill compared to previous year's language during a House debate.
Share
More from William Tauzin
ETBE is included within the definition of a renewable fuel. The conference report attempts to provide maximum flexibility to the refining marketplace to achieve the goals of both the new renewable fuels requirement and, therefore, ETBE is…
The conferees intend that section 231 of the conference agreement shall go into effect immediately upon enactment and be available to license applicants in all ongoing and future hydroelectric licensing proceedings under the Federal Power…
This Nation is suffering. We are in dire need of a policy that tells the energy future traders on Wall Street to quit running the prices up and to begin thinking about a future where we are producing more energy at home for our own people…
CBO's estimates now indicate that this bill makes oncologists perfectly whole in this first year of the changeover. In fact, for the first 2 years, it is a neutral completely, and oncologists will be getting something like 2 2 o 3 times…
Other voices in this conversation
