if the purpose of the government's action in denying the permit is not to protect wetlands in general for the rest of us, is not really to protect endangered species for all the rest of us, but if the purpose is to deny your right to damage your neighbor, that is already in the bill as an exception to compensation. You do not need this amendment. This amendment will deny legitimate claims for de minimus effects on neighbors. It is not the right thing to do. We ought to defeat it.
William Tauzin: “if the purpose of the government's action in denying the permit is not to protect wetlands in general for the rest of…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to government permits and property rights.
Share
More from William Tauzin
Paul Gillmor and I make the following joint statement. The Committee on Energy and Commerce exercises exclusive jurisdiction over the protection of drinking water and groundwater sources. As a result, we believe it is essential that…
Let me join in expressing the sorrow of the folks in Louisiana for your loss in South Carolina. We will pray for his soul. Mr. Speaker, the Democratic substitute in this debate can be summed up rather easily. According to CBO, it will…
I want to illustrate one of the real inadequacies of the Democratic substitute. In the main bill we reformed something called average wholesale price. I hope everyone knows what that is. I am going to illustrate it for you tonight. Under…
The conferees intend that section 231 of the conference agreement shall go into effect immediately upon enactment and be available to license applicants in all ongoing and future hydroelectric licensing proceedings under the Federal Power…





