if ever there was an amendment that provided preferential speech in America it is the Torricelli amendment, and we ought to strike it. This amendment says that somehow Federal candidates for office in America, Federal politicians are entitled to special privileges, special rates, special time on the broadcast waves of America while other citizens are treated differently. Other citizens do not get those breaks. Other people who want to speak in this country politically do not get those breaks, just Federal candidates. Come on. This is the sort of thing the Founding Fathers worried about when they wrote the first amendment that said we should protect American citizens against the government dictating free speech.
William Tauzin: “if ever there was an amendment that provided preferential speech in America it is the Torricelli amendment, and we ought…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Torricelli amendment regarding preferential treatment for federal candidates in political speech.
Share
More from William Tauzin
The Secretary should perform these reviews as expeditiously as possible once the R&D or procurement has started so as to prevent any exports of countermeasures or countermeasure R&D that could harm our U.S. national security.
Mr. Speaker, there may be no other bill the House considers this year or next that will benefit America more than H.R. 6, the Energy Policy Act of 2003. Let me tell my colleagues what this conference report is about. It is about America's…
Mr. Speaker, let me point out to my friend from California, the Committee on Energy and Commerce had a chance to look at the Senate-passed bill. My colleagues on the other side offered it in the markup of the Committee on Energy and…
Let me reiterate again, the motion to instruct, to all Members of the House who are paying attention to this debate, basically says to the Senate and House conferees: accept the Senate language, take the Senate bill, take the Democratic…





