Mr. Chairman, CARA is financed from the receipts of the Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas production. It is not coming out of general revenues. Since the inception of that OSC program, Congress always intended that a portion of these receipts would be reinvested in conservation purposes through programs like the Land and Water Conservation Fund. Now, I do not know if my colleagues are aware of it, but there are nearly $13 billion now in the Land and Water Conservation Fund and over $2 billion in the Historic Preservation Fund in unappropriated balances that already have been authorized by Congress. Congress has fully intended to do this. We just have not been doing it. And the source of the funding has always been intended for this purpose. It has just never been spent. Well, not all of that after all. We are talking about a total program that costs about 2 cents out of every $100 of the Federal budget. And Congress has been, in fact, spending a good portion of it in. In fiscal year 2001, for example, there is a $1.4 billion request in the administration's budget. That is half of this program right there. In other words, we are talking about one penny out of every $100 of Federal spending, a minimal effect on the budget, but a maximum effect on the purposes of this act if this amendment is adopted.
William Tauzin: “Mr. Chairman, CARA is financed from the receipts of the Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas production. It is not coming…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the funding and purpose of the Conservation and Reinvestment Act (CARA) during a committee meeting.
Share
More from William Tauzin
I share your grief at the passing of former President Ronald Reagan and join you in remembering his remarkable service to our country. I was fortunate to have served as a Member of Congress during President Reagan's eight year tenure. At…
Mr. Speaker, again let me read the language of the bill that the gentleman just referred to, that terrible piece of language. It says in effect that in administering the prescription drug benefit program established under this, the…
Let me reiterate again, the motion to instruct, to all Members of the House who are paying attention to this debate, basically says to the Senate and House conferees: accept the Senate language, take the Senate bill, take the Democratic…
yes, it does. And it is a little complex, so let me try to explain. Briefly the requester would, in fact, pay the same transmission cost as any other transmission customer. The embedded cost language simply clarifies that in the up-front…





