let me see if I can help set the record straight. Our bill does not give away spectrum to the broadcasters to do anything with other than to broadcast over the air in this transition from one technology to the other. And then it requires the return of the old technology spectrum to the people of the United States. Second, the bill provides that, if the broadcasters should use any of that spectrum for any purpose other than over-the-air broadcasting, they have to pay for it like everybody else. That is what the bill currently says. One final point: The issue of a broadcast spectrum is tied up with something called the public interest standard. It has to do with the trade we made a long time ago to licensed broadcasters who operate under a public interest standard, a relicensing by the FCC, and a review of that licensing over time. If my colleagues want to change that policy, and some do, they ought not make it in a budget meeting; they ought to make it in the committee of jurisdiction where we examine what happens on television and what broadcasters do with the license they get to operate in the public interest standard. I urge my colleagues to pass this bill and let us debate that issue in the committee of jurisdiction where it belongs.
William Tauzin: “let me see if I can help set the record straight. Our bill does not give away spectrum to the broadcasters to do…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill related to broadcast spectrum and public interest standards.
Share
More from William Tauzin
Let me join in expressing the sorrow of the folks in Louisiana for your loss in South Carolina. We will pray for his soul. Mr. Speaker, the Democratic substitute in this debate can be summed up rather easily. According to CBO, it will…
I got a letter from the Congressional Budget Office indicating that they prepared a preliminary estimate of the impact of the Democratic amendment to H.R. 1, the Democratic plan; and the estimate of CBO of their plan is $1 trillion. So a…
I particularly also want to congratulate and thank my friend, the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Markey), the ranking member of the subcommittee, and my dear friend, the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Dingell), the dean of our House and…
Mr. Speaker, let me point out to my friend from California, the Committee on Energy and Commerce had a chance to look at the Senate-passed bill. My colleagues on the other side offered it in the markup of the Committee on Energy and…





