No, contractual changes are not. Agreements are not. It is only when the Government mandates a change, a regulation, that diminishes the value or subtracts from the property right that triggers the action for an arbitration and compensation under the bill.
William Tauzin: “No, contractual changes are not. Agreements are not. It is only when the Government mandates a change, a regulation…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the conditions under which government actions trigger arbitration and compensation.
Share
More from William Tauzin
I got a letter from the Congressional Budget Office indicating that they prepared a preliminary estimate of the impact of the Democratic amendment to H.R. 1, the Democratic plan; and the estimate of CBO of their plan is $1 trillion. So a…
In fact, we have been asked so many times, is this a free-speech issue. The United States Constitution gives you the right to speak; it does not give you the right to be heard. None of us have an obligation to listen if we do not want to…
This Nation is suffering. We are in dire need of a policy that tells the energy future traders on Wall Street to quit running the prices up and to begin thinking about a future where we are producing more energy at home for our own people…
The conferees intend that section 231 of the conference agreement shall go into effect immediately upon enactment and be available to license applicants in all ongoing and future hydroelectric licensing proceedings under the Federal Power…





