How can you not have that? You are in charge of the program.

But you said you are still willing to use it, didn't you?

I would hope that you would go back and look at the history.

I don't understand how you can sit here and tell us you are serious about reforming this loan program.

We have got Members on both the Republican and the Democrat side that have read this.

There is $16.1 billion of taxpayer money at risk.

You are telling us you don't even know what happened.

I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will report the amendment. The Clerk read as follows: At the end of the bill, before the short title, insert the following: Sec. __. None of the funds made available under this…

This amendment is very limited and straightforward to deal with a problem that we've started getting a lot of calls from Realtors in our district, as I'm sure many of my colleagues across the country are receiving, as well as property…

I think it is important for us to go back, you know, because we take for granted that technology--you know, I can look on my video device and watch Swamp People episodes on this video device and yet the laws that we have on the books today…

Modernizing this decades-old regulatory framework should instead focus on providing relief to all stakeholders by repealing the intertwined 1976 and 1988 compulsory copyright licenses as well as the 1992 cable Act.

Since Congress created the problem decades ago, it has a responsibility to review and fix them today.