Political Quotes

On the recordApril 26, 1994
the House and Senate Democrats are currently meeting behind closed doors to craft a partisan campaign finance bill that they claim will bring ``reform'' to the election process. However, press reports indicate that this bill will actually deliver permanent incumbent protection along with public financing of campaigns. Not only will they impose sham ``limits'' on campaigns that could run in excess of $1 million per campaign, but the Democrats are actually going to vote to give themselves and all other candidates running for the House and Senate up to more than $300,000 in taxpayer funds, to use in their campaigns. Those taxpayer's funds are often known as welfare for the politicians. Any advocate of true campaign finance reform believes that we must reform the rules governing special interest Political Action Committee contributions. Current law allows $5,000 PAC contributions, which go overwhelmingly to incumbents. PAC's gave $94 million to House incumbents and only $12 million to House challengers in the 1991-92 election cycle. It is no wonder then that the so-called reform bill under consideration by the Democrats would maintain $5,000 PAC contributions, which favor incumbents and protect the Democrat majority in the Congress. Reports indicate that the Senate Democrats understand that PAC reform is necessary for any real campaign reform bill, and they may include a PAC ban or a $1,000 PAC limit.
Said by
Robert Livingston
Republican · Louisiana

Editor's note · Context

Criticizing a partisan campaign finance bill proposed by House and Senate Democrats.

Share

More from Robert Livingston

Mar 9, 1994

following up the comments of the preceding Member, I just have to say that there really are so many questions that have arisen about Whitewatergate in the press and in media commentaries throughout America over the last several weeks, it…

govinfo.gov
Mar 22, 1994

I am grateful we are here, but I am at a loss to understand what the controversy has been about over these last several months. A resolution like this should have passed without discussion months ago. This really is not a partisan issue…

govinfo.gov
May 25, 1994

I rise now in opposition to the rule. I support the bill. It is a fundamentally sound bill, maintaining the trend of ever-lower yearly foreign aid appropriations. But many of the remaining Members of the House are not getting adequately…

govinfo.gov
May 25, 1994

I am as much a cold warrior of the old days as the gentleman that just spoke, but I rise in opposition to this amendment. Mr. Chairman, my friend, the gentleman from Alabama means well, but when he says there is no progress in Russia, my…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation