I am as much a cold warrior of the old days as the gentleman that just spoke, but I rise in opposition to this amendment. Mr. Chairman, my friend, the gentleman from Alabama means well, but when he says there is no progress in Russia, my goodness. Just in the last eight months they have adopted a new constitution, they have had parliamentary elections, they have a brand new legislative body which is operating fairly rapidly, perhaps at least as rapidly as this body. They have over half the work force in private hands. Inflation is staying down. Ten percent a month is a lot, but good grief, compared to other nations around the world they are looking good. They have established stock markets, and their people are actively trading these stock holdings. This amendment would cut precisely the kind of aid that is necessary to help the Russians privatize their economy and democratize their government, and get them in a peaceful mode so they dismantle their missiles, and not destroy the whole world with nuclear holocaust.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to U.S. aid for Russia during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Robert Livingston
if we are worried about disclosure, we should not accept the gift, we should not go to the dinner, we should not go to the golf game. Disclosure is the best reform, and this is a half-hearted attempt at reform.
I would like to take this opportunity and thank Chairman Brooks for incorporating my base conversation amendment as part of his en bloc amendment. Mr. Chairman, my amendment originally was a provision of what I call my LIFER Plus bill…
following up the comments of the preceding Member, I just have to say that there really are so many questions that have arisen about Whitewatergate in the press and in media commentaries throughout America over the last several weeks, it…
I would like him to explain that to the 40 people killed in Somalia that they were not part of the peacekeeping effort in Somalia.





