They can't make a crime. They hold back to the fact that we can impeach him for anything.
Mike Johnson
The Public Record
Mike Johnson is an American attorney and politician currently serving as the U.S. Representative for Louisiana's 4th congressional district, a position he has held since January 3, 2017. A member of the Republican Party, Johnson has focused on various issues during his tenure, including fiscal responsibility and national security. He has been involved in legislative discussions surrounding war funding and government operations, emphasizing the need for appropriate timing and details in such matters.
You are impeaching him because you have wanted to for 3 years. You can't beat him in a reelection.
The truth is, in the history of this republic, there has never been a single party fraudulent impeachment process deployed against a President like the one that is being used against Donald Trump.
The first article charges the President with the made-up crime of abuse of office.
It is never proper for a United States President to hold a foreign country over a barrel to make them do that President's personal bidding.
But putting aside the severely flawed process by which the Democratic majority has proceeded, they have simply failed to establish a viable case for impeachment against the President.
The leaders of one-half of one branch of government have decided that they, not the American people, should determine who their President should be.
What do you want from Ukraine? I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want him to do what he said.
Adam Schiff's own words and Al Green's own words. Adam Schiff, even the other day giving one of his press conferences, which he loves dearly.
This is never going to stop. I agree with my colleague from Ohio; it is never going to stop.
If the Democrats really want to charge somebody with abuse of power, they should look no further than Chairman Schiff.
You can't have quid pro quo, you can't have pressure if the gentleman who is supposedly pressured says there is no pressure.
The Democrats know there is zero direct evidence in the record of these proceedings to show that President Trump engaged in any scheme.
The President has been talking about foreign governments and foreign corruption and the misuse of American taxpayers' treasure since before he ran for President.
And all power in the executive branch derives from the President. And the President can and should ask for assistance from foreign governments in ongoing criminal investigations.
We are here fundamentally because they cannot accept the fact that he won the 2016 election.
This has been a truly extraordinary and historically unprecedented hearing. It has, frankly, been an outrageous violation of due process.
Under Resolution 660, we're supposed to follow the Federal rules of evidence. Is that right?





