On the recordApril 12, 1994
I understand the Senator's answer to be yes, that he does agree with me that this would enhance the bargaining power of Catellus if the amendment of the Senator from Utah passes.
Source
govinfo.govJohn Johnston: “I understand the Senator's answer to be yes, that he does agree with me that this would enhance the bargaining power of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of an amendment on Catellus's bargaining power.
Share
More from John Johnston
May 4, 1994
So in effect, any involvement with charities by Senators, whether it is sponsoring a charity, whether it is being the honoree of the charity, whether it is using your name on the stationery, or being on a sponsoring committee, All of that…
May 4, 1994
It is my understanding of S. 1935 that it will be practically impossible for Members to make an effort, either directly or indirectly, to assist worthwhile causes--that is, tax-exempt, charitable entities.
May 5, 1994
Did the Senator know that in the last 2 years the Senate gave $1.3 million to charity on these direct fees?
May 5, 1994
The actual wording is not that the trip is not substantially recreational, but that the activities as part of the trip are not substantially recreational, which I think is a significant difference because you can have a serious trip that…
Other voices in this conversation
