Take whatever you want to. Let us say the tobacco industry goes to wherever you want to go to and they have fun and they do not do any serious work, we will say that is a bad trip. If you had to disclose that, do you think any Senator is going to go to that sort of thing now, and is that not sufficient protection, rather than trying to get in and, by the sledgehammer when you get that gnat then you have hit the symphony ball and the National Guard dance and all of these other really good charities?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of disclosure requirements for Senators regarding industry events.
Share
More from John Johnston
I commend the Senator from Wyoming for a very powerful statement on the subject of the starvation, from a budgetary standpoint, of the national parks. He is surely, surely correct on that issue. Mr. President, I hope all of my colleagues…
I rise to speak in support of title VI of S. 4, the National Competitiveness Act of 1994. Title VI establishes the Information Technology Applications Act of 1994. This act amends and builds on the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991…
Under the Senator's amendment, would he not agree with me that rather than to have three interpretative rulings on--I forget what it was the Senator said; three rulings for events? Would you really have to have an interpretative ruling on…
would the Senator not agree with me that when on page 36 it defines ``gift'' as including a charitable contribution made on the basis of a designation, recommendation, or other specification made to a lobbyist or foreign agent by a Member…





