Take whatever you want to. Let us say the tobacco industry goes to wherever you want to go to and they have fun and they do not do any serious work, we will say that is a bad trip. If you had to disclose that, do you think any Senator is going to go to that sort of thing now, and is that not sufficient protection, rather than trying to get in and, by the sledgehammer when you get that gnat then you have hit the symphony ball and the National Guard dance and all of these other really good charities?
John Johnston: “Take whatever you want to. Let us say the tobacco industry goes to wherever you want to go to and they have fun and they…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of disclosure requirements for Senators regarding industry events.
Share
More from John Johnston
Is it not a fact that the Levin-Wellstone amendment allows the same thing, only while ours would be limited to $75, yours is unlimited, provided it is motivated by personal friendship, to be decided by the Member?
Did the Senator know that in the last 2 years the Senate gave $1.3 million to charity on these direct fees?
The Senator just mentioned our bill allows for unlimited and undisclosed meals, et cetera, and listed four things dealing with meals, tickets and gifts.
The actual wording is not that the trip is not substantially recreational, but that the activities as part of the trip are not substantially recreational, which I think is a significant difference because you can have a serious trip that…





